Tuesday, November 29th, 2022 00:03:18

No easy alternatives to petrol

Updated: July 19, 2018 2:09 pm

In terms of US dollar, India was the fourth largest importer of oil (the first three being China, the United States and Japan) in 2017. This year, it may overtake Japan in importing oil to become the third largest. In fact, with the rising prices of oil in the international market, India’s import bill went up by 25 percent in 2017-18 to $109.11 billion over the previous financial year. Obviously, this is not a good status to have. But then the fact remains that India imports nearly 80 percent of its oil-requirements, which, in turn, will only go up in the coming days as we are a developing country.  Our domestic production is not rising. According to the latest government report, India’s indigenous crude oil production, both on shore (Assam, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu) and off shore, in April 2018 remained nearly flat, decreasing marginally by 0.83 percent to 2.915 tm as compared to 2.939 tm produced in the corresponding month a year ago, pushing the country’s import dependence to 83.7 percent for the month.

Against this background, there is no real possibility of the government bringing down the prices of oil, a populist demand that the opposition parties are going to town with. It may be noted that the Manmohan Singh-government had deregulated or freed petrol pricing from its control in June 2010. The Narendra Modi-government went further to free the   diesel pricing in October 2014. The Modi government has allowed revision of prices on daily basis since mid-June last year to reflect changes in cost instantly.  But then the fact remains that the price we pay to buy petrol or diesel is twice the price we import them from the international market (which at present is in between 70 to 75 US dollars per barrel). We pay the high price because petroleum is the taxation milch cow for the central and the state governments and it is unlikely to be brought under the GST any time soon, though the central government is in its favour. I bet  Arvind Kejriwal in Delhi, Mamata Banerjee in Kolkata and the Communist government in Kerala will ever bring down their share of taxes even if the petrol costs more than Rs. 100 /- per litre.

Given all this, it is understandable why the Modi government is laying so much emphasis on alternate or non-traditional sources of energy such as nuclear, solar and wind etc. Technologically speaking, the world is seeing three major trends in the energy sector. One is the  “hy­draulic frac­tur­ing”.  The sec­ond  is the use of so­lar en­ergy from pho­to­voltaic(PV) cells, also com­monly re­ferred to as “so­lar pan­els”. The third  is the wide-scale dis­tri­b­u­tion of bat­ter­ies, not only for the use of elec­tric ve­hi­cles, but also for ap­pli­ca­tion in micro grids and for other uses.

Hy­draulic frac­tur­ing, popularly known as “frack­ing” in oil and gas ex­trac­tion , involves the use of high pres­sure and frac­tur­ing stim­u­la­tion– and hor­i­zon­tal drilling, in or­der to ac­cess oil and gas re­serves in shale and other for­ma­tions. By press­ing wa­ter, sand, and other ma­te­ri­als into promis­ing ge­o­log­i­cal lay­ers and rocks, small frac­tures emerge through which oil and gas are re­leased and can be pumped to the sur­face. However, this technology is being used gainfully in only one particular part of the world – North America, the United States in particular. It is picking up in China, but it is way behind. There are three main reasons for this state of affairs. One, the regulatory factor in other parts of the world is proving to be very difficult, particularly in the areas of environmental clearance and taxation matters. Two, the technology needs heavy investments, which many countries find prohibitive, particularly when petroleum can be bought much more cheaply as things stand today. Three, services and material related to the fracking are mainly available in the United States.

In the case of India, we have another major difficulty with fracking, even though according to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,  the “country holds promising reserves of shale gas and oil resources.”  And that is the factor of water. In North America, fracking requires  less than one percent of the locally available water  for the extraction of natural gas or oil; but in the case of India, studies say that the Cambay Basin, Gondwana Basin, KG Basin, Cauvery Basin, Indo-Gangetic Basin, Assam and Assam-Arakan Basin  – all  considered prospective from the shale oil and gas point of view –  will require more than 50 percent of regional water resources for complete shale extraction. We simply cannot afford that much water when “the Composite Water Management Index report” from the NITI Aayog has said that the country is facing its “worst” water crisis in history and critical groundwater resources – which account for 40% of India’s water supply – are being depleted at unsustainable rates.

In contrast, solar energy holds better potentials for India. As with the global trend, India produces more solar power with each passing year. In fact, it expanded the  solar-generation capacity 8 times from 2,650 MW on 26 May 2014 to over 20 GW as on 31 January 2018. This figure,  initially targeted for 2022, has been achieved  four years ahead of schedule, a rare achievement. The country added 3 GW of solar capacity in 2015-2016, 5 GW in 2016-2017 and over 10 GW in 2017-2018, with the average current price of solar electricity dropping to 18% below the average price of its coal-fired counterpart.  As the In­ter­na­tional En­ergy Agency (IEA) has con­firmed in a re­port,  PV now con­sti­tutes the largest part of all ad­di­tional elec­tric­ity gen­er­a­tion, eas­ily sur­pass­ing coal, wind, and nat­ural gas. No wonder why India plans to make renewable power account for 40 percent of its total installed capacity by 2030, from 20 percent currently.

However, it may be noted that in­stalled ca­pac­ity is not the same as gen­er­ated elec­tric­ity.  Com­pared to fos­sil or nu­clear power plants, so­lar power plants fea­ture greater dis­crep­an­cies be­tween ca­pac­ity and ac­tual elec­tric­ity gen­er­a­tion. There­fore, the share of so­lar as a part of global elec­tric­ity con­sump­tion will not in­crease as quickly as the in­stalled ca­pac­ity. Secondly, China is the biggest player on the mar­ket to­day, with  60 per cent of global so­lar man­u­fac­tur­ing ca­pac­ity being  lo­cated in China. The Chi­nese gov­ern­ment has mas­sively sup­ported the build­ing up of a PV man­u­fac­tur­ing in­dus­try, pro­tected the mar­ket, and con­cen­trated global pro­duc­tion in the re­gion. It has literally made manufacturers of the industry in the US and Europe bankrupt. Even Indian industry faces the pinch. So much so that the Modi government is contemplating  to impose  a 25 percent duty on imports of solar cells and modules from China for one year to try to counter what it sees as a threat to domestic solar equipment manufacturing.

At the moment, over 90 percent of solar panels and equipments are imported by India from China since these are becoming cheaper and cheaper. Ironically, with these cheap equipments, India is producing more solar power; that means when the equipments become costlier to support the indigenous industry, solar power generation will be affected adversely. Thirdly, as is the case all over the world, the in­te­gra­tion of  more so­lar en­ergy into the elec­tric­ity sys­tems  will put grid op­er­a­tors and na­tional elec­tric­ity com­pa­nies un­der stress. On the one hand, they will be forced to in­vest in ad­di­tional mea­sures to main­tain high lev­els of sys­tem sta­bil­ity. On the other hand, they will lose rev­enues if they do not own so­lar ca­pac­i­ties them­selves. This, in turn, may  eat into the rev­enue streams of elec­tric­ity sup­pli­ers and force them to ei­ther charge cus­tomers more in or­der to fi­nance their fos­sil in­vest­ments or take po­lit­i­cal mea­sures to keep so­lar off the grid.

The Chinese domination is also a problem in the sphere of battery revolution. The abil­ity to store elec­tric­ity in batteries on a large scale has long been one of the big dreams of mankind. For highly polluted cities in India, batteries will provide perhaps the cleanest energy for transport( electric cars). But then,  in­dus­trial bat­tery de­vel­op­ment is pri­mar­ily en­forced by only a cou­ple of states, particularly China. And this geopolitical factor will play a negative role until and unless there are indigenous alternatives. The government has big plans to  encourage the electric cars on the Indian road and for this some Indian companies are collaborating with Japanese firms like Nissan. Be that as it may, power through batteries is a long term goal.

What all this means is that there is no easy alternatives to the fossil fuel. India will continue to depend on petroleum products for many years to come. That means that we have to depend on a stable international market for our growing oil needs. And this stability depends on our capacity to deal with the geopolitics  of oil –  our relations with the Gulf countries ( our main sources of import – Iraq and Saudi Arabia; this region is also home to 7 million Indian workers) on the one hand and Iran ( our third largest source of import; also our principal transport-link with Afghanistan and

Central Asia, besides being the global leader of the Shias who in India are considered more liberal than their Sunni counterparts) on the other; and our ability to diversify the sources of imports from countries like Russia on the one hand and the USA on the other( last October, the Modi government created history by receiving 1.6 million barrels of American shale oil at Paradip port). This geopolitics is a complex game and needs a separate treatment in another

column. But, for the time being, this much can be said that in Dharmendra Pradhan India has a petroleum minister who understands this geopolitics well and is acting accordingly.

By Prakash Nanda


Comments are closed here.