L’affaire Fai In Perspective
The practice of intelligence agencies floating and funding non-governmental organisations and even publishing houses for using them for PSYWAR purposes was born during the Second World War and extensively used during the subsequent Cold War against the former USSR and its communist allies.
In the 1960s and the 1970s, the US media highlighted this practice and revealed the links of many supposedly prestigious US non-governmental organisations to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). One of these organisations used to fund the visits of many senior Indian government servants to the US for some purpose or the other.
A senior official of our Ministry of Home Affairs, who was on a Congressional fellowship in the US at the invitation of a highly prestigious non-Governmental organisation, was embarrassed when the US media identified it as funded and used by the CIA for softening public opinion moulders in other countries.
He immediately drew the attention of the Government of India to this report and asked for instructions whether he should terminate his fellowship and return to India. The Government of India advised him not to do so. It felt that he had not done anything wrong since he had no way of knowing that the CIA was behind that organisation.
This practice was also followed by the MI-6, the UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, its external intelligence agency. In fact some years ago, in reply to a question in the House of Commons, the British Government admitted that some of the anti-communist best-sellers were sponsored and funded by the MI-6.
After the end of the Cold War, this practice has come down but has not been abandoned. Intelligence agencies continue to float and fund non-governmental organisations, seminars etc for PSYWAR purposes. In addition, they also seek to soften political leaders by making contributions to their election funds.
In the 1980s, during the jihad against the Soviet troops in Afghanistan, considerable money was spent by the CIA and the Saudi intelligence for carrying on a PSYWAR against the Soviet troops through non-governmental organisations. Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), which played a role in assisting in these PSYWAR activities, which were often in the Pashtun language, acquired considerable expertise in this field.
It has since been using this expertise for achieving its Kashmir-related objectives. Since 1989, the ISI has either floated a number of non-governmental organisations or has been funding organisations which already existed in order to use them against the Government of India. There are many such organisations in the West floated and/or funded by the ISI.
The more active amongst them is the Kashmiri American Council (KAC) of Washington DC headed by Ghulam Nabi Fai , a US resident of Kashmiri origin. For nearly two decades, the KAC has been organising activities such as printing and disseminating propaganda pamphlets and other literature on alleged human rights violations in Jammu & Kashmir, holding national seminars in the US to which only residents in the US are invited, holding international seminars to which the participants are invited from many countries including India, lobbying against the Government of India in the US Congress and in the margins of international human rights conferences and softening US politicians by contributing to their election funds.
Fai Bares Its Fang
A number of US lawmakers and Indian liberals are coming under scrutiny for their ties with the alleged ISI lackey Ghulam Nabi Fai, following the FBI expose of his connections to Pakistan’s notorious intelligence agency ISI in its quest to reverse Kashmir’s accession to India.
A search of Federal Election Commission records and websites tracking political contributions showed Fai and the Kashmiri American Council made a contribution to the tune of $23,500 US lawmakers and the US political system over the past 15 years, although the FBI estimates that Pakistan funneled in more than $ 4 million during that time to manipulate the debate on Kashmir in its favour. More contributions to the US political system are believed to have come from other Pakistani-ISI proxies, including US-based physicians and businessmen.
Dr Ghulam Nabi Fai is the Executive Director of the Washington based Kashmiri American Council (KAC). He believes in the settlement of the Kashmir conflict through tripartite negotiations between Governments of India and Pakistan and the accredited leadership of the people of the State of Jammu & Kashmir.
Another group which has come under the scanner is so-called secular Indian intellectuals who accepted Fai’s and KAC’s hospitality to attend conferences and seminars in US on the Kashmir issue, where, US authorities say, Fai and his ISI handlers piled up the Pakistani agenda. Journalist-activists Kuldip Nayar, Dileep Padgaonkar, Praful Bidwai and Gautam Navlakha are among those who attended KAC events organised by Fai whom turns out were funded by ISI. The US authorities have stated that Fai and KAC pushed the Pakistan agenda on Kashmir with illicit money.
The so-called Left-lib crowd has been put in a further bind by the US stand on how the Kashmir conferences were manipulated. In fact, the FBI affidavit shows that the ISI and the Pakistani government micromanaged KAC conferences and seminars, including dictating which Indian guests and how many would be invited. The affidavit did not name people, but cited one instance where an ISI handler gave Fai a list of Indian nationals to invite to a Kashmir conference in the US. The FBI also recorded Fai’s direct contacts with his ISI handlers at one such conference.
There were strong indications for many years that Fai and his organisation were promoting such activities at the instance of the ISI with funds provided by it. His activities were against US laws, but the US agencies chose to close their eyes to them and refrained from taking any criminal action against him because of what the US perceived as the useful role played by Pakistan as a frontline ally in the war against terrorism.
There are two kinds of activities which intelligence agencies indulge in foreign territory—secret, but declared and secret and undeclared. The liaison relationships for intelligence co-operation would come under the secret, but declared category. Unilateral HUMINT operations such as the one which ultimately led to the killing of Osama bin Laden and other clandestine activities, which are kept deniable, would come under the secret and undeclared category.
Since the beginning of this year, there have been complaints in Pakistan that since 9/11 there has been a mushrooming of the US intelligence presence in Pakistan due to an increase in secret and undeclared activities of the US agencies. After the Raymond Davis affair of January last, the Pakistan government has been trying to keep a greater check on such activities through measures such as asking the US to reduce its intelligence presence and tightening the procedure for the issue of visas to suspected, but undeclared intelligence personnel.
The activities of Fai and his organisation came under the category of secret and undeclared activities of the ISI in US territory. In return for the Pakistan government closing its eyes to the secret and undeclared activities of the US intelligence in Pakistani territory, the US closed its eyes to the secret and undeclared activities of the ISI in US territory so long as those activities were directed against India and were not considered detrimental to the national security of the US.
Now that there has been a change in Pakistan’s policy and it has abandoned its hitherto permissive attitude to the secret and undeclared activities of the US intelligence in Pakistani territory, the US has decided to retaliate by giving up its permissive attitude and putting an end to the secret and undeclared activities of the ISI in US territory. That is the message from the arrest on July 19, 2011, of Fai and another person for indulging in illegal activities as undeclared foreign agents and the decision to prosecute them.
While we should be gratified over the US action, we should avoid over-assessing its significance as an indicator of US solidarity with India or as a precursor to a possible change in the US attitude to Pakistani claims and designs relating to J&K. It is an opportunistic and tactical action to exercise pressure on Pakistan and its ISI to do the US bidding and nothing more.
By B Raman
Comments are closed here.