Thursday, 6 August 2020

‘Spirited’ Navjot Sidhu Clashes With Star India

Updated: September 11, 2015 6:30 am

STAR India and Navjot Singh Sidhu are sparring over Rs. 22.5-cr Commentary Deal. It has come as a surprise to people who admire the way he recites shaiyari and guffaws in Kapil Sharma’ s Comedy Nights. The channel has alleged that despite being bound by an exclusivity clause, commentator Navjot Singh Sidhu breached his contract by rendering his services to a rival channel for IPL 2014; the High Court has appointed a Mumbai-based advocate as arbitrator to settle the dispute. Reported By Mid-Day.com a three-year commercial deal, to the tune of Rs 22.5 crore, between cricket commentator Navjot Singh Sidhu and television major Star India, has gone into arbitration, following allegations that the former India opener had breached a contractual agreement of ‘exclusivity’ by working for Star India’s competitor. Accepting Star India’s plea that arbitration proceedings be initiated for breach of contract so that it can seek damages and a refund of fees paid to Sidhu, Bombay High Court Justice R D Dhanuka appointed Mumbai-based Advocate Zal Andhyarujina as the sole arbitrator.

Mid-day claims to have access to the order, which was issued on July 22 this year. The arbitrator held the first meeting between the parties involved recently and issued directions to facilitate further proceedings. As per the three-year deal, beginning from May 2013, Sidhu, who was a sitting Member of Parliament from the BJP at the time, had agreed to be bound by an exclusivity obligation, under which, amongst other points, he had agreed to work exclusively for Star (Sports) India and not any third party (including other third-party broadcasters). The deal said that Sidhu would provide not less than 150 days of commentary for the first calendar year of the agreement and not less than 180 days for the subsequent calendar years. Further, Star India agreed to pay him the yearly fees in advance, within six months of execution of the agreement, and paid him advance fees of Rs 8 crore.

Star India alleged that despite making timely payments of the advance fees, Sidhu failed to meet his commitments because he provided only 41 days of commentary and completely disregarded the exclusivity commitment by agreeing to work for its competitor, Sony, for IPL 2014, in contravention of his obligation. Sources said that Star India had invested its time, money and man-hours of its various personnel in order to build Sidhu as its principal Hindi commentator for Star Sports. They said the premium for his fees was largely derived from the fact that he would be exclusive to the channel. According to the HC’s order, the applicant (Star India) vide their advocate’s notice dated March 18, 2015, invoked the arbitration agreement and suggested the name of a retired judge of the Supreme Court to act as the sole arbitrator. The respondent (Sidhu), however, did not respond to the said notice and even did not suggest any name, the order said. The order further said that an arbitration agreement existed between the parties.

“Since the respondent has not nominated any arbitrator within 30 days from the date of receipt of the said notice, present application filed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is maintainable,” it said, requesting the arbitrator to dispose of the proceedings expeditiously.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Categories